Active legitimation of the powers to litigate

PENSAR A LA FACULTADES COMO AMICUS CURIAE

Authors

  • Gabriel O. Bosco Universidad Nacional de La Matanza - Argentina
  • Cinthia Noelia Aguirre Universidad Nacional de La Matanza - Argentina

Keywords:

college autonomy, Faculties legal competence, amicus curiae, college conflicts

Abstract

The present essay studies the faculties or academic units’ legal competence to litigate against the University to which they belong, its extent and possible solutions. To do so, we analyze two judicial precedents and the existing regulatory framework. We focus on the risk of the continuation of a career from a decision of the Superior Council of the University. In that respect, we proposed solutions that the Legislative power could provide to regulate the Faculty’s participation to a situation like this. Therefore, in the light of the analysis about the applied doctrine by our Highest Court and current regulation, we believe the suited is which denies the legal competence of the Faculty, as it violates the college autonomy given by the article 75 subparagraph 19 of the National Constitution, but recognizes the interest it could have and awards the possibility to intervene in a judicial process against its University as amicus curiae

investigación bosco - aguirre

Published

2021-11-16

How to Cite

Bosco, G. O., & Aguirre, C. N. (2021). Active legitimation of the powers to litigate: PENSAR A LA FACULTADES COMO AMICUS CURIAE. Revista De La Escuela Del Cuerpo De Abogados Y Abogadas Del Estado, 1(6), 404–420. Retrieved from http://edu.ptn.gov.ar/index.php/revistaecae/article/view/86